MVP Sports Talk
your authority on up to date sports news and opinions
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
WCAC Major Talent Pool for Colleges
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Daily News Editor Passes Knowledge onto Journalism Class
NCAA Rips PSU with Excessive Sanctions
Sure I like the fact that the University will be forced to give several million dollars to the prevention of pedophilia and the sexual abuse of children, but why do it in a specified lump sum payment that will most likely be passed onto the students of the university and will have a negative effect on the University’s other sports? Instead it should have been a five or six year process in which all revenue generated from the football that DOES NOT go towards funding other sports programs. That way the University still loses money but doesn’t hurt the smaller athletic programs that had absolutely nothing to do with anything Sandusky related that went down.
Worse than the massive payment that could easily become the crippling blow to several of the University’s minor sports is the shadow that has been the cast across not only the entirety of State College and the football program, but also over every alumnus of the school. The severity and length of the punishment will just remind of the terrible transpirings every time the Penn State football team takes the field. No—every time the institution is even brought up.
These sanctions thrown down by NCAA President Emmert will not let Penn State University put these horrific events behind them. It will simply serve as a painful reminder to students, fans and especially to the victims of that monster Jerry Sandusky. The message would have been sent with a one or two-year bowl ban, five less scholarships per year and the required donation (broken into several different payments) from the football team’s revenue. Instead what we saw wasn’t just harsh punishment, it was sanctions that completely destroy the Penn State football program. It basically puts this storied program on equal footing with FCS schools.
What bothers me most of all of this however is the deletion of every single Nittany Lion win since 1998. What purpose does that serve? What ineligible players were used? There were absolutely no grounds for that type of punishment. Sandusky’s actions and the subsequent follow up did not in any way shape or form have a positive effect on the team’s performance. In addition what good is tarnishing the legacy even more of a dead man? There isn’t.
Even more it takes those wins away from the student-athletes that played in Happy Valley over that period of time. Former Nittany Lion and current Washington Redskin running back Evan Royster was among the hundreds of athletes affected. Yesterday he expressed his disappointment; a sentiment shared by many of the former PSU athletes, when he tweeted “ah crap... so I lost every college football game I ever played in?” Oh and did I mention that the NCAA didn’t even take proper procedure when determining the punishment. Mark Emmert came up with the decision without even running it past his council. It’s just ridiculous.
When its all said and done though one thing stands true. Happy Valley isn’t very happy anymore.
Saturday, October 29, 2011
A (Proposed) Solution to the English Premier League's Debt Crisis
In terms of popularity and exposure in the United States, England’s Barclays Premier League has grown exponentially over the past two years, and for good reason. It’s the most-watched professional sports league in the world, and of all the soccer leagues on Earth, the EPL’s brand of soccer is the most entertaining to watch. MVP Sports Talk’s Edgar Walker reflects on the massive debt crisis crippling many EPL clubs, and brings forward his own proposal to solve the problem.
The FA, England soccer’s governing body, rules over the affairs of the international squads representing the countries, as well as the country’s domestic leagues. Recently, the British government has been putting pressure on The FA to reduce debt levels at some of the major squads in the Premier League. As a result of inflated transfer budgets and player salaries, along with expensive development projects, some of the top English-based clubs are facing massive debt situations, with the worst cases nearing £1 billion.
What many American fans of the EPL don’t realize is that clubs are not guaranteed revenue, as they are in the major leagues in the U.S. Even struggling franchises, namely the Florida Marlins, Jacksonville Jaguars, or Sacramento Kings, still turn profits each season of operation because of shared revenue agreements in the MLB, NFL, and NBA. Because of the promotion/relegation system seen in soccer leagues around the world, revenue sharing is unseen because of the fluid atmosphere of the leagues. Additionally, many of England’s largest cities are home to several different clubs. Because of this, clubs are almost never given any sort of public funding to help build stadiums, develop areas around the stadium, et cetera. On top of all this, consider the over-inflated transfer market, and the fact that each year, more and more money must be spent by clubs who are trying to stay competitive and economically viable in a top-flight league. Eventually (or in some cases, very quickly), the various expenses add up, and put clubs in a financial bind.
My proposal is a simple one; punish clubs on the field for their misbehavior off the field. In the same way that the MLB has a “luxury tax” for those teams that are the most aggressive spenders, the EPL should establish a point deduction system for the biggest spenders in each transfer window. For every £10 million a club spends on transfers, they’d be deducted one point before their season began. The same would go for the January transfer window. There are three reasons why this would be an effective solution for The FA to utilize:
1) Debt would not increase as quickly; clubs such as Manchester City and Chelsea would not spend enormous sums of money on overpriced players in the transfer window.
2) The transfer market would return to a more reasonable state. Clubs without super-rich owners could compete for the same quality players as the cash-laden clubs of the league. In turn, the league would be more competitive; TV ratings would rise, and more fans would be interested in the latter months of the season.
3) Teams would look to reduce spending by turning to their youth academies, and specifically looking to develop cheap, English players. Consequently, the national team would have an influx of talented, well-coached young players coming from academies.
Obviously this solution is one with a few flaws, and it would undoubtedly incite outrage from the rich clubs who are used to spending large sums of money to be competitive. With that said, it’s an idea worth looking into, and at this point, any idea is worth something. The debt problem is widespread in the EPL and across the world, and in a time when the world economy is in worse condition than it’s been for years, it makes little sense for soccer clubs to spend more and more money each year.
Edgar Walker is a young, Baltimore-based sportswriter. Check out his work on Baltimore Sports Report, or follow him on Twitter.
Friday, October 28, 2011
Friday, October 7, 2011
TCU Expected to Join Big 12
-A